Jesus told his disciples that a person couldn’t “serve two masters…for he will love the one and despise the other.” I believe that this is also true for worship styles. When a church divides its focus it usually (there are some rare, notable exceptions) does one style with passion, and the other with apathy. One style gets the resources, talent, attention of the leader, and the financial support, the other becomes the recipient of whatever is left. Eventually it takes on a “thrown together” feel as it becomes obvious that this is “the other” worship experience.
So what does this mean? I am coming to believe that a congregation should do one style of worship, do it passionately, and do it to the best of their ability. The concentration of resources, the focus upon the intentionality of the experience, and the dedication of the leadership will increase the impact and focus of that worship experience. Distraction will be reduced, and the stress of trying to radically shift gears for the leadership will be eliminated, possibly even allowing them to worship instead of manage the “style.”
What is the cost of eliminating and concentrating your worship focus? This focus will make some of your spiritual consumers unhappy (spiritual consumerism is a whole other issue!) because they are not getting the “product” that they are “paying for.” It will mean that you aren’t doing what everybody else is doing, cause “all my friends churches are doing it.” You will lose people because you get intentional, but that is okay. If we learn nothing else from Jesus it is that growth always follows pruning. Most of the time before you can get to the harvest there has to be the elimination of distraction.
So whether you are rocking it with the organ, Bach choral responses, and artfully written liturgy or celebrating with praise music, drums, and a casual atmosphere do whatever you do, do “as unto the Lord!”
I’d love to hear your feedback! What do you think?